# Phase 7.2: Security — JTI Claim + Redis Access-Token Revocation - Context **Gathered:** 2026-06-05 **Status:** Ready for planning ## Phase Boundary Phase 7.2 delivers two security primitives: (1) a `jti` UUID claim embedded in every new access token, and (2) a `user_nbf:{user_id}` Redis key checked in `get_current_user` that immediately invalidates all tokens issued before a security event (password change, TOTP enroll/revoke, account deactivation). This closes the 15-minute gap where a revoked session's live access token remains valid even after its refresh tokens are killed. No schema migrations. No new endpoints. No frontend changes. ## Implementation Decisions ### D-01 — JTI claim Add `jti=str(uuid.uuid4())` to the `create_access_token` payload in `backend/services/auth.py`. The `jti` claim is included on every token but is used only as an identity handle — per-JTI Redis tracking is NOT implemented (user-level NBF replaces it, see D-02). ### D-02 — Revocation approach: user-level NBF key, not per-JTI Set `user_nbf:{user_id}` = Unix timestamp in Redis (TTL = 15 min, the access token lifetime) when any of these security events fire: `change_password`, `enable_totp`, `disable_totp`, admin account deactivation. In `get_current_user`, after a successful decode, read `user_nbf:{user_id}` from Redis. If the key exists and `token["iat"] < nbf_timestamp` → raise HTTP 401. This covers ALL sessions uniformly — the calling session's own token is also immediately blocked (its iat predates now()), but it recovers transparently by exchanging its still-live refresh token (which Phase 7.1 D-02 preserved) for a new access token with iat > nbf. Per-JTI tracking is not added: the jti claim is reserved for Phase 7.3+ (ES256 migration) where it may be needed alongside the algorithm upgrade. ### D-03 — Redis access pattern in get_current_user Use `request.app.state.redis` directly inside `get_current_user`. This is consistent with the existing pattern in `backend/api/auth.py` (lines 197, 566). `get_current_user` already accepts `request: Request`, so no signature change is needed. No new `get_redis` dependency function. ### D-04 — Redis failure handling: fail-open If the Redis `GET user_nbf:{user_id}` call raises an exception (connection error, timeout), log a warning and allow the request to proceed. Same pattern as the HIBP fail-open in `services/auth.py`. Availability takes priority over blocking tokens during a Redis outage. ### D-05 — Admin account deactivation coverage The existing deactivation handler in `backend/api/admin.py:351` already calls `revoke_all_refresh_tokens`. Add the `user_nbf` write there too. The target user's access token (unknown JTI) is fully blocked via the user-level key; no per-JTI lookup needed. ### D-06 — TTL for user_nbf key 15 minutes — matches the access token TTL. Keys auto-expire when the last old token would have anyway. No Redis accumulation over time. ## Canonical References **Downstream agents MUST read these before planning or implementing.** ### Authentication service - `backend/services/auth.py` — `create_access_token` (~line 86): add `jti` claim here; `revoke_all_refresh_tokens` (~line 218): pattern for where to add `user_nbf` writes; TOTP `verify_totp` (~line 271): example of Redis access from a service function - `backend/deps/auth.py` — `get_current_user` (~line 38): the NBF check is added here, after `decode_access_token` succeeds and before the DB lookup ### Admin deactivation - `backend/api/admin.py:351` — deactivation handler: add `user_nbf` write here alongside `revoke_all_refresh_tokens` ### Phase 7.1 decisions (must not conflict) - `.planning/phases/07.1-security-session-revocation-on-privilege-change/07.1-CONTEXT.md` — D-02: current refresh token is preserved on privilege change; this is why the 401→refresh recovery in D-02 above works ### Security concern definitions - `.planning/codebase/CONCERNS.md` §"No JTI Claim and No JTI Revocation in Redis" — original concern description and fix approach ### CLAUDE.md security rules - `CLAUDE.md` §"Login token hardening" — mandates JTI in every token stored in Redis; and "Password change, TOTP enroll/revoke, and account deactivation immediately revoke all active sessions" ## Existing Code Insights ### Reusable Assets - `create_access_token` in `services/auth.py:86` — add `jti=str(uuid.uuid4())` to the payload dict; PyJWT encodes it verbatim - `decode_access_token` in `services/auth.py:102` — returns the full payload dict; jti is accessible as `payload["jti"]` after decode - `app.state.redis` — aioredis client, `await redis.get(key)` returns `bytes | None`; `await redis.set(key, value, ex=seconds)` writes with TTL ### Established Patterns - Redis key style: `totp_used:{user_id}:{code}` — use same `snake_case:colon` pattern → `user_nbf:{user_id}` - Fail-open: `backend/services/auth.py` HIBP check returns `False` on network errors and logs a warning — mirror this exact pattern for the Redis check in `get_current_user` - `request.app.state.redis` access: `backend/api/auth.py:197` and `:566` — copy this inline access pattern verbatim ### Integration Points - `backend/services/auth.py` — `create_access_token`: only file generating JWTs; change here propagates to all token issuance - `backend/deps/auth.py` — `get_current_user`: only entry point for validating access tokens on all protected routes; NBF check belongs here - `backend/api/auth.py` — `change_password`, `enable_totp`, `disable_totp`: add `await redis.set(f"user_nbf:{user_id}", int(time.time()), ex=900)` before `session.commit()` - `backend/api/admin.py:351` — deactivation handler: same Redis write pattern ## Specific Ideas - The `user_nbf` value stored in Redis should be a Unix integer timestamp (`int(time.time())`). In `get_current_user`, parse it as `int(nbf_bytes.decode())` and compare to `payload["iat"]` (which PyJWT decodes as an int automatically). - TTL = 900 seconds (15 * 60) — hardcode this constant alongside `ACCESS_TOKEN_EXPIRE_MINUTES` in settings or services/auth.py. - The `jti` payload key is lowercase, consistent with RFC 7519. PyJWT accepts arbitrary keys in the payload dict. ## Deferred Ideas - **Per-JTI Redis tracking** — storing each issued JTI in Redis for individual token revocation. Not needed because user-level NBF covers the same use case more efficiently. - **Phase 7.3 — ES256 algorithm upgrade**: Replace HS256 with ECDSA P-256 key pair. The jti claim added in this phase is a prerequisite. Tracked in CONCERNS.md §"JWT Algorithm Downgrade: HS256 Instead of ES256". - **Phase 7.4 — Token fingerprinting / token binding**: Add `fgp` (fingerprint) claim = HMAC of `User-Agent + Accept-Language`. Tracked in CONCERNS.md §"No Token Fingerprint / Token Binding". --- *Phase: 07.2-security-jti-claim-redis-access-token-revocation-inserted* *Context gathered: 2026-06-05*