6.9 KiB
Phase 7.2: Security — JTI Claim + Redis Access-Token Revocation - Context
Gathered: 2026-06-05 Status: Ready for planning
## Phase BoundaryPhase 7.2 delivers two security primitives: (1) a jti UUID claim embedded in every new access token, and (2) a user_nbf:{user_id} Redis key checked in get_current_user that immediately invalidates all tokens issued before a security event (password change, TOTP enroll/revoke, account deactivation). This closes the 15-minute gap where a revoked session's live access token remains valid even after its refresh tokens are killed.
No schema migrations. No new endpoints. No frontend changes.
## Implementation DecisionsD-01 — JTI claim
Add jti=str(uuid.uuid4()) to the create_access_token payload in backend/services/auth.py. The jti claim is included on every token but is used only as an identity handle — per-JTI Redis tracking is NOT implemented (user-level NBF replaces it, see D-02).
D-02 — Revocation approach: user-level NBF key, not per-JTI
Set user_nbf:{user_id} = Unix timestamp in Redis (TTL = 15 min, the access token lifetime) when any of these security events fire: change_password, enable_totp, disable_totp, admin account deactivation.
In get_current_user, after a successful decode, read user_nbf:{user_id} from Redis. If the key exists and token["iat"] < nbf_timestamp → raise HTTP 401. This covers ALL sessions uniformly — the calling session's own token is also immediately blocked (its iat predates now()), but it recovers transparently by exchanging its still-live refresh token (which Phase 7.1 D-02 preserved) for a new access token with iat > nbf.
Per-JTI tracking is not added: the jti claim is reserved for Phase 7.3+ (ES256 migration) where it may be needed alongside the algorithm upgrade.
D-03 — Redis access pattern in get_current_user
Use request.app.state.redis directly inside get_current_user. This is consistent with the existing pattern in backend/api/auth.py (lines 197, 566). get_current_user already accepts request: Request, so no signature change is needed. No new get_redis dependency function.
D-04 — Redis failure handling: fail-open
If the Redis GET user_nbf:{user_id} call raises an exception (connection error, timeout), log a warning and allow the request to proceed. Same pattern as the HIBP fail-open in services/auth.py. Availability takes priority over blocking tokens during a Redis outage.
D-05 — Admin account deactivation coverage
The existing deactivation handler in backend/api/admin.py:351 already calls revoke_all_refresh_tokens. Add the user_nbf write there too. The target user's access token (unknown JTI) is fully blocked via the user-level key; no per-JTI lookup needed.
D-06 — TTL for user_nbf key
15 minutes — matches the access token TTL. Keys auto-expire when the last old token would have anyway. No Redis accumulation over time.
<canonical_refs>
Canonical References
Downstream agents MUST read these before planning or implementing.
Authentication service
backend/services/auth.py—create_access_token(~line 86): addjticlaim here;revoke_all_refresh_tokens(~line 218): pattern for where to adduser_nbfwrites; TOTPverify_totp(~line 271): example of Redis access from a service functionbackend/deps/auth.py—get_current_user(~line 38): the NBF check is added here, afterdecode_access_tokensucceeds and before the DB lookup
Admin deactivation
backend/api/admin.py:351— deactivation handler: adduser_nbfwrite here alongsiderevoke_all_refresh_tokens
Phase 7.1 decisions (must not conflict)
.planning/phases/07.1-security-session-revocation-on-privilege-change/07.1-CONTEXT.md— D-02: current refresh token is preserved on privilege change; this is why the 401→refresh recovery in D-02 above works
Security concern definitions
.planning/codebase/CONCERNS.md§"No JTI Claim and No JTI Revocation in Redis" — original concern description and fix approach
CLAUDE.md security rules
CLAUDE.md§"Login token hardening" — mandates JTI in every token stored in Redis; and "Password change, TOTP enroll/revoke, and account deactivation immediately revoke all active sessions"
</canonical_refs>
<code_context>
Existing Code Insights
Reusable Assets
create_access_tokeninservices/auth.py:86— addjti=str(uuid.uuid4())to the payload dict; PyJWT encodes it verbatimdecode_access_tokeninservices/auth.py:102— returns the full payload dict; jti is accessible aspayload["jti"]after decodeapp.state.redis— aioredis client,await redis.get(key)returnsbytes | None;await redis.set(key, value, ex=seconds)writes with TTL
Established Patterns
- Redis key style:
totp_used:{user_id}:{code}— use samesnake_case:colonpattern →user_nbf:{user_id} - Fail-open:
backend/services/auth.pyHIBP check returnsFalseon network errors and logs a warning — mirror this exact pattern for the Redis check inget_current_user request.app.state.redisaccess:backend/api/auth.py:197and:566— copy this inline access pattern verbatim
Integration Points
backend/services/auth.py—create_access_token: only file generating JWTs; change here propagates to all token issuancebackend/deps/auth.py—get_current_user: only entry point for validating access tokens on all protected routes; NBF check belongs herebackend/api/auth.py—change_password,enable_totp,disable_totp: addawait redis.set(f"user_nbf:{user_id}", int(time.time()), ex=900)beforesession.commit()backend/api/admin.py:351— deactivation handler: same Redis write pattern
</code_context>
## Specific Ideas- The
user_nbfvalue stored in Redis should be a Unix integer timestamp (int(time.time())). Inget_current_user, parse it asint(nbf_bytes.decode())and compare topayload["iat"](which PyJWT decodes as an int automatically). - TTL = 900 seconds (15 * 60) — hardcode this constant alongside
ACCESS_TOKEN_EXPIRE_MINUTESin settings or services/auth.py. - The
jtipayload key is lowercase, consistent with RFC 7519. PyJWT accepts arbitrary keys in the payload dict.
- Per-JTI Redis tracking — storing each issued JTI in Redis for individual token revocation. Not needed because user-level NBF covers the same use case more efficiently.
- Phase 7.3 — ES256 algorithm upgrade: Replace HS256 with ECDSA P-256 key pair. The jti claim added in this phase is a prerequisite. Tracked in CONCERNS.md §"JWT Algorithm Downgrade: HS256 Instead of ES256".
- Phase 7.4 — Token fingerprinting / token binding: Add
fgp(fingerprint) claim = HMAC ofUser-Agent + Accept-Language. Tracked in CONCERNS.md §"No Token Fingerprint / Token Binding".
Phase: 07.2-security-jti-claim-redis-access-token-revocation-inserted Context gathered: 2026-06-05