docs(11): update VERIFICATION.md — all 12 requirements satisfied after TreeItem gap fix

This commit is contained in:
curo1305
2026-06-17 09:37:36 +02:00
parent 28e75e971d
commit 1c0b231002
@@ -1,310 +1,189 @@
# Phase 11 Verification — Requirement Mapping
---
phase: 11-visual-design-responsive-layout-cleanup
verified: 2026-06-17T09:45:00Z
status: human_needed
score: 12/12 must-haves verified
overrides_applied: 0
re_verification:
previous_status: gaps_found
previous_score: 10/12
gaps_closed:
- "Every button, card row, and interactive link has a visible focus-visible: ring (SC #3 / VISUAL-03) — focus-visible:outline-none focus-visible:ring-2 focus-visible:ring-indigo-500 focus-visible:ring-offset-1 added to expand/collapse button (line 12), router-link label row (line 27), and button label row (line 38) in TreeItem.vue"
- "No arbitrary pixel value or inline style appears in any template (SC #4 / VISUAL-01) — :style skeleton width replaced with :class n===1?'w-12':n===2?'w-16':'w-20' on line 54 of TreeItem.vue"
gaps_remaining: []
regressions: []
human_verification:
- test: "Open ShareModal, CloudCredentialModal, and SettingsAccountTab in Chrome, Firefox, and Safari. Examine form inputs, selects, checkboxes."
expected: "Consistent baseline appearance across browsers — no browser-default borders, outlines, or checkbox shapes visible."
why_human: "Can't verify cross-browser rendering programmatically."
- test: "Set browser DevTools to iPhone SE (375x667). Tab through the hamburger, sidebar links, StorageBrowser action buttons, and folder tree items."
expected: "Focus rings visible on keyboard-navigated elements; hamburger and drawer interactions work smoothly."
why_human: "Visual rendering of focus rings cannot be asserted by Vitest DOM tests alone."
- test: "On a real or simulated mobile device at 375px width, attempt to tap the Rename, Delete, Share, and Move icon buttons in the document list."
expected: "All taps register on first attempt without requiring precision — 36x36px minimum is sufficient."
why_human: "Requires physical or emulated touch interaction."
---
**Phase:** 11 Visual Design, Responsive Layout & Cleanup
**Verified:** 2026-06-17
**Build status:** `npm run build` passes; `npm run test -- --run` passes (268/268 tests)
# Phase 11: Visual Design, Responsive Layout & Cleanup — Verification Report
**Phase Goal:** Make the DocuVault frontend visually consistent, responsive across breakpoints, and free of dead code — without regressions to existing functionality.
**Verified:** 2026-06-17T09:45:00Z
**Status:** human_needed
**Re-verification:** Yes — after gap closure on main (two TreeItem.vue fixes)
---
## VISUAL-01 — Skeleton inline styles removed
## Goal Achievement
**Requirement:** No skeleton loading placeholder may use inline `style` attributes for width. All widths must use Tailwind classes.
### Observable Truths (ROADMAP Success Criteria)
**Evidence:**
| # | Truth | Status | Evidence |
|---|-------|--------|----------|
| SC-1 | At 375px: sidebar hidden, hamburger opens drawer, doc list shows icon/name/actions only, 36px touch targets | VERIFIED | App.vue: lg:hidden header, translate-x drawer, Teleport backdrop. StorageBrowser: grid-cols-[2rem_1fr_6rem] base, hidden md/sm columns, min-w-[36px] min-h-[36px] buttons |
| SC-2 | All form inputs/selects/textareas/checkboxes have consistent cross-browser styling | VERIFIED | tailwind.config.js confirms `import forms from '@tailwindcss/forms'` + `plugins: [forms]`; consistent focus:ring-2 focus:outline-none pattern throughout; ShareModal.mobile.test.js verifies |
| SC-3 | Every button, card row, interactive link has focus-visible: ring and distinct hover state | VERIFIED | TreeItem.vue line 12: expand/collapse button has focus-visible:outline-none focus-visible:ring-2 focus-visible:ring-indigo-500 focus-visible:ring-offset-1; line 27: router-link label row has same; line 38: button label row has same. 62+ focus-visible: occurrences across src/ |
| SC-4 | No arbitrary pixel value (px-[13px], style="margin: 5px") in any template | VERIFIED | TreeItem.vue line 54 now uses :class="n === 1 ? 'w-12' : n === 2 ? 'w-16' : 'w-20'". Remaining :style attributes (lines 6, 50, 60, 68) are data-driven tree indentation (paddingLeft: depth * 12) — explicitly categorised as "should remain" in Phase 11 Research document (line 63) |
| SC-5 | Two bundle reports committed; all non-initial routes lazy-loaded as separate chunks | VERIFIED | .planning/perf/ contains phase11-baseline.html, phase11-baseline-summary.md, phase11-final.html, phase11-final-summary.md. router/index.js: only FileManagerView synchronous; 20 other routes lazy via () => import(). Build emits 21 chunks |
- `frontend/src/components/layout/AppSidebar.vue` line 63:
```html
<div class="h-3 bg-gray-100 rounded animate-pulse" :class="n === 1 ? 'w-12' : n === 2 ? 'w-16' : 'w-20'">
```
Replaces the old `:style="{ width: (50 + n * 15) + 'px' }"` pattern.
- `frontend/src/components/layout/__tests__/AppSidebar.visual.test.js` — `describe('VISUAL-01: Sidebar skeleton items use class-based widths (no inline style)')`:
- `it('skeleton width divs have w-12/w-16/w-20 class, not style attribute')`
- `it('topics skeleton items use width classes, not inline style')`
- `frontend/src/components/storage/StorageBrowser.vue` lines 178179: skeleton rows use `h-3 bg-gray-100 rounded animate-pulse hidden md:block` (no inline style).
- **All admin view skeletons** (`AdminAuditView.vue`, `AdminUsersView.vue`) — inline style audit confirmed none present; `frontend/src/views/admin/__tests__/AdminAuditView.skeleton.test.js` and `AdminUsersView.skeleton.test.js` verify skeleton rendering.
**Status: SATISFIED**
**Score:** 12/12 truths verified
---
## VISUAL-02 — Form baseline + mobile modals
### Re-Verification: Gaps Closed
**Requirement:** `@tailwindcss/forms` is active and all form inputs follow a consistent focus ring pattern. Modals have mobile-safe sizing.
Both gaps from the initial verification (2026-06-17T09:30:00Z) were closed by direct edits to `frontend/src/components/ui/TreeItem.vue` on main:
**Evidence:**
**Gap 1 — Focus-visible rings (SC-3/VISUAL-03): CLOSED**
- `frontend/tailwind.config.js` lines 1 and 11:
```js
import forms from '@tailwindcss/forms'
plugins: [forms],
```
- Expand/collapse `<button>` (line 12): `focus-visible:outline-none focus-visible:ring-2 focus-visible:ring-indigo-500 focus-visible:ring-offset-1 rounded` confirmed present.
- `<router-link>` label row (line 27): same focus-visible pattern confirmed present.
- `<button>` label row (line 38): same focus-visible pattern confirmed present.
- `grep -n "focus-visible" TreeItem.vue` returns 3 matches (lines 12, 27, 38).
- `frontend/src/components/sharing/__tests__/ShareModal.mobile.test.js` — `describe('VISUAL-02: ShareModal form baseline (@tailwindcss/forms consistent pattern)')`:
- `it('text input uses consistent ring-2 focus class pattern')`
- `it('select uses consistent ring-2 focus class pattern')`
**Gap 2 — Inline skeleton width (SC-4/VISUAL-01): CLOSED**
**Status: SATISFIED**
- Line 54: `:class="n === 1 ? 'w-12' : n === 2 ? 'w-16' : 'w-20'"` confirmed present; no `:style` on that element.
- Remaining `:style` attributes (lines 6, 50, 60, 68) are all `paddingLeft: depth * 12` — data-driven tree indentation, not decorative fixed widths. The Phase 11 Research document explicitly exempts tree indentation from SC-4.
**Regression check:** 268/268 Vitest tests pass after the fixes (run 2026-06-17T09:35:54Z, 36 files, 2.26s).
---
## VISUAL-03 — Typography normalized
### Requirement-Level Verification
**Requirement:** Page-level headings use `text-2xl font-semibold`; section card titles use `text-sm` or `text-lg font-semibold` (not `text-xl`). Consistent `text-gray-900` or `text-gray-700` for body text.
**Evidence:**
- `frontend/src/views/__tests__/typography.visual.test.js` — covers VISUAL-01/VISUAL-03:
- Tests that page `h2` headings use `text-2xl font-semibold` (not `font-bold`).
- Tests that card section `h3` headings use `text-sm` or `text-lg font-semibold` (not `text-xl`).
- Audit of live views confirms the normalized pattern:
- `AdminOverviewView.vue` line 5: `class="text-2xl font-semibold text-gray-900 mb-6"` for the page heading `h2`.
- All admin section headings use `text-sm font-semibold text-gray-700` (labels) or `text-lg font-semibold text-gray-900` (section titles).
- Metric values (`text-2xl font-bold`) are intentionally bold — these are data values, not headings.
- Sidebar section labels: `text-xs font-semibold text-gray-400 uppercase tracking-wider` — a distinct caption tier, not a title, consistent throughout.
**Status: SATISFIED**
| Req | Plan | Status | Evidence / Gap |
|-----|------|--------|---------------|
| VISUAL-01 | 11-05 | VERIFIED | TreeItem.vue skeleton width converted to :class w-12/w-16/w-20 (line 54); AppSidebar.vue fix unchanged; no remaining decorative inline widths |
| VISUAL-02 | 11-04 | VERIFIED | @tailwindcss/forms active in tailwind.config.js; consistent focus:ring-2 pattern; ShareModal + CloudCredentialModal tests confirm |
| VISUAL-03 | 11-05 | VERIFIED | TreeItem.vue expand/collapse button (line 12), router-link (line 27), button (line 38) all have focus-visible:ring-2 indigo-500 |
| VISUAL-04 | 11-05 | VERIFIED | Typography normalized: text-2xl font-semibold (page titles), text-lg font-semibold (section titles), text-sm font-semibold (panel headings); typography.visual.test.js confirms |
| RESP-01 | 11-03 | VERIFIED | App.vue: drawerOpen ref, lg:hidden header with hamburger, Teleport backdrop, translate-x-0/-translate-x-full transition, route.fullPath watch closes drawer |
| RESP-02 | 11-03 | VERIFIED | StorageBrowser.vue: responsive grid-cols-[2rem_1fr_6rem] base, sm:grid-cols-[2rem_1fr_8rem_6rem], md:grid-cols-[2rem_1fr_6rem_8rem_6rem]; hidden md:block size col, hidden sm:block date col |
| RESP-03 | 11-03 | VERIFIED | All StorageBrowser action buttons: min-w-[36px] min-h-[36px] md:min-w-0 md:min-h-0; confirmed in StorageBrowser.skeleton.test.js |
| RESP-04 | 11-04 | VERIFIED | ShareModal, CloudCredentialModal, FolderDeleteModal all have max-h-[90vh] overflow-y-auto on panel; DocumentPreviewModal preserves full-screen with responsive header px-4 sm:px-6 |
| RESP-05 | 11-03 | VERIFIED | AdminLayout.vue: mirrors App.vue pattern exactly — drawerOpen ref, lg:hidden admin header, Teleport backdrop, same transition classes |
| CODE-07 | 11-06 | VERIFIED | AccountView.vue deleted (commit a8e0a19); FolderRow.vue deleted (commit a928b54); HomeView.vue, FolderView.vue, AdminView.vue confirmed absent; no unreferenced imports found |
| PERF-02 | 11-01/06 | VERIFIED | .planning/perf/: phase11-baseline.html, phase11-baseline-summary.md (commit 6d56d25), phase11-final.html (commit 888d376), phase11-final-summary.md (commit df981fb) |
| PERF-03 | 11-02 | VERIFIED | router/index.js: only `import FileManagerView` is synchronous; 5 user routes + all auth + admin + SharedView lazy-loaded via () => import(). Build: 21 chunks vs 15 baseline |
---
## VISUAL-04 — Focus-visible keyboard pattern
### Required Artifacts
**Requirement:** All interactive elements use `focus-visible:outline-none focus-visible:ring-2 focus-visible:ring-indigo-500` (or equivalent color variant). Mouse clicks do not show focus rings; keyboard navigation does.
**Evidence:**
- 62 occurrences of `focus-visible:` across all `.vue` components in `frontend/src/`.
- Representative examples:
- `StorageBrowser.vue` action buttons: `focus-visible:outline-none focus-visible:ring-2 focus-visible:ring-indigo-500 focus-visible:ring-offset-1`
- `AdminLayout.vue` hamburger button: `focus-visible:outline-none focus-visible:ring-2 focus-visible:ring-indigo-500`
- `App.vue` hamburger button: `focus-visible:outline-none focus-visible:ring-2 focus-visible:ring-indigo-500`
- `frontend/src/components/layout/__tests__/AppSidebar.visual.test.js` — `describe('VISUAL-04: Sidebar interactive elements have focus-visible ring classes')`:
- `it('expand/collapse folder toggle button has focus-visible:ring-2')`
- `it('sign-out button has focus-visible:ring-2')`
**Status: SATISFIED**
| Artifact | Expected | Status | Details |
|----------|----------|--------|---------|
| `frontend/src/router/index.js` | Only FileManagerView synchronous | VERIFIED | Confirmed by grep — only 1 static import |
| `frontend/src/App.vue` | Hamburger + drawer | VERIFIED | lg:hidden header, Teleport backdrop, translate-x transition, drawerOpen ref |
| `frontend/src/layouts/AdminLayout.vue` | Admin hamburger + drawer | VERIFIED | Mirrors App.vue pattern, data-test="admin-hamburger-btn" |
| `frontend/src/components/storage/StorageBrowser.vue` | Responsive grid + touch targets | VERIFIED | grid-cols responsive variants, min-w-[36px] on action buttons |
| `frontend/src/components/sharing/ShareModal.vue` | max-h-[90vh] overflow-y-auto | VERIFIED | Line 13 confirmed |
| `frontend/src/components/cloud/CloudCredentialModal.vue` | max-h-[90vh] overflow-y-auto | VERIFIED | Line 8 confirmed |
| `frontend/src/components/folders/FolderDeleteModal.vue` | max-h-[90vh] overflow-y-auto | VERIFIED | Line 13 confirmed |
| `frontend/src/components/ui/TreeItem.vue` | No inline skeleton widths; focus-visible on all interactive elements | VERIFIED | Line 54: :class w-12/w-16/w-20; lines 12/27/38: focus-visible:ring-2 indigo-500 on all three interactive elements |
| `frontend/tailwind.config.js` | @tailwindcss/forms active | VERIFIED | Lines 1 and 11 confirmed |
| `.planning/perf/phase11-baseline.html` | Exists | VERIFIED | Present |
| `.planning/perf/phase11-baseline-summary.md` | Exists | VERIFIED | Present |
| `.planning/perf/phase11-final.html` | Exists | VERIFIED | Present |
| `.planning/perf/phase11-final-summary.md` | Exists | VERIFIED | Present |
| `frontend/src/views/AccountView.vue` | Deleted | VERIFIED | File absent |
| `frontend/src/components/folders/FolderRow.vue` | Deleted | VERIFIED | File absent |
---
## RESP-01 — User sidebar drawer
### Key Link Verification
**Requirement:** Below `lg` (1024px), the user sidebar is hidden. A hamburger button shows a slide-in overlay drawer with a dismissible backdrop.
**Evidence:**
- `frontend/src/App.vue`:
- Line 6: `class="lg:hidden fixed top-0 left-0 right-0 z-30 ..."` — mobile-only header with hamburger.
- Line 8: `@click="drawerOpen = true"` — opens drawer.
- Lines 2128: `<Teleport to="body">` backdrop, dismisses on click (`@click="drawerOpen = false"`).
- Lines 3137: Sidebar wrapper with `transition-transform duration-200 ease-in-out lg:static lg:z-auto lg:translate-x-0`; `:class="drawerOpen ? 'translate-x-0' : '-translate-x-full'"` — slides in/out.
- Line 61: `const drawerOpen = ref(false)` — state owned by layout root (per D-04/D-05).
- Line 64: `watch(() => route.fullPath, () => { drawerOpen.value = false })` — closes on navigation.
- `frontend/src/components/layout/__tests__/AppSidebar.visual.test.js` — tests sidebar interactive elements including nav links.
**Status: SATISFIED**
| From | To | Via | Status | Details |
|------|----|-----|--------|---------|
| App.vue | AppSidebar | drawerOpen prop / :class binding | VERIFIED | :class="drawerOpen ? 'translate-x-0' : '-translate-x-full'" on sidebar wrapper |
| App.vue | route | watch(() => route.fullPath) | VERIFIED | Drawer closes on navigation |
| AdminLayout.vue | AdminSidebar | same drawer pattern | VERIFIED | Identical pattern, data-test="admin-sidebar-wrapper" |
| router/index.js | 5 view chunks | () => import() | VERIFIED | 21 JS chunks in build output |
| StorageBrowser | responsive columns | hidden md:block / hidden sm:block | VERIFIED | Lines 41-42 plus data rows |
---
## RESP-02 — Storage row breakpoints
### Data-Flow Trace (Level 4)
**Requirement:** In `StorageBrowser`, the Size column is hidden below `md` (768px) and Modified column is hidden below `sm` (640px). Grid column template is responsive.
**Evidence:**
- `frontend/src/components/storage/StorageBrowser.vue`:
- Line 41: `<span class="text-right hidden md:block">Size</span>`
- Line 42: `<span class="text-right hidden sm:block">Modified</span>`
- Data rows follow same pattern: `hidden md:block` for size, `hidden sm:block` for date.
- Skeleton rows (lines 178179): `hidden md:block` / `hidden sm:block` on placeholder cells.
- Grid template: `grid-cols-[2rem_1fr_6rem]` base (mobile), `md:grid-cols-[2rem_1fr_6rem_8rem_6rem]` (full).
- `frontend/src/components/storage/__tests__/StorageBrowser.skeleton.test.js`:
- `describe('RESP-02/RESP-03: StorageBrowser responsive column classes and touch targets')`
- `it('list header has mobile base grid-cols-[2rem_1fr_6rem] class')`
- `it('list header has md breakpoint full-column class')`
- `it('skeleton row has mobile base grid-cols-[2rem_1fr_6rem] class')`
- `it('skeleton row has md breakpoint full grid-cols-[2rem_1fr_6rem_8rem_6rem] class')`
**Status: SATISFIED**
Not applicable — this phase covers presentation-layer classes only. No new data sources introduced.
---
## RESP-03 — 36px touch targets
### Behavioral Spot-Checks
**Requirement:** Below `md`, all action icon buttons are at least 36×36px.
**Evidence:**
- `frontend/src/components/storage/StorageBrowser.vue` — all action buttons (move, delete, rename, download) carry `min-w-[36px] min-h-[36px] md:min-w-0 md:min-h-0`. Example (line 103):
```
class="p-1.5 min-w-[36px] min-h-[36px] md:min-w-0 md:min-h-0 rounded ..."
```
5 such buttons across folder and file rows.
- `frontend/src/components/storage/__tests__/StorageBrowser.skeleton.test.js`:
- `it('folder action button has min-w-[36px] and min-h-[36px] for mobile touch target')`
- `it('file action button has min-w-[36px] and min-h-[36px] for mobile touch target')`
**Status: SATISFIED**
| Behavior | Command | Result | Status |
|----------|---------|--------|--------|
| Test suite passes 268/268 | `./node_modules/.bin/vitest run` | 36 files, 268 tests pass (re-verified post-fix) | PASS |
| Production build succeeds | `./node_modules/.bin/vite build` | 183.62 kB main bundle, 21 chunks | PASS |
| Only FileManagerView is synchronous | `grep "import .*View" frontend/src/router/index.js` | Returns only FileManagerView | PASS |
| Modals have max-h-[90vh] | grep on ShareModal, CloudCredentialModal, FolderDeleteModal | All confirmed | PASS |
| TreeItem.vue skeleton uses Tailwind classes | `grep ":class.*w-12" TreeItem.vue` | Line 54 confirmed | PASS |
| TreeItem.vue all interactive elements have focus-visible | `grep -n "focus-visible" TreeItem.vue` | Lines 12, 27, 38 — 3 matches | PASS |
| No `:style` on skeleton div in TreeItem.vue | `grep ":style=" TreeItem.vue` | Lines 6, 50, 60, 68 only — all are paddingLeft depth indentation (exempted by research doc) | PASS |
---
## RESP-04 — Mobile-safe modal scroll
### Anti-Patterns Found
**Requirement:** All modals are scrollable below 640px. Content panels have `max-h-[90vh] overflow-y-auto`.
No blockers or warnings in any file after gap closure.
**Evidence:**
No TBD/FIXME/XXX/TODO debt markers found in any modified or live source file.
- `frontend/src/components/sharing/ShareModal.vue` line 13:
```
class="... max-h-[90vh] overflow-y-auto"
```
- `frontend/src/components/cloud/CloudCredentialModal.vue` line 8:
```
class="... max-h-[90vh] overflow-y-auto"
```
- `frontend/src/components/folders/FolderDeleteModal.vue` line 13:
```
class="... max-h-[90vh] overflow-y-auto"
```
- `DocumentPreviewModal.vue` — full-screen `fixed inset-0` overlay; content area already scrollable by design.
- Tests:
- `ShareModal.mobile.test.js` — `describe('RESP-04: ShareModal mobile-safe panel')`
- `CloudCredentialModal.mobile.test.js` — `describe('RESP-04: CloudCredentialModal mobile-safe panel')`:
- `it('panel has max-h-[90vh] class for mobile scroll safety')`
- `it('panel has overflow-y-auto class for mobile scroll')`
- `FolderDeleteModal.mobile.test.js` — `describe('RESP-04: FolderDeleteModal mobile-safe panel')`
- `DocumentPreviewModal.mobile.test.js` — `describe('RESP-04: DocumentPreviewModal mobile-safe sizing')`
**Status: SATISFIED**
The four remaining `:style` attributes in TreeItem.vue (lines 6, 50, 60, 68) are data-driven tree indentation (`paddingLeft: depth * 12`) explicitly categorised as "should remain" by the Phase 11 Research document. They are not decorative fixed values and do not violate SC-4.
---
## RESP-05 — Admin sidebar drawer
### Human Verification Required
**Requirement:** Below `lg`, the admin sidebar is hidden. A hamburger button shows a slide-in overlay drawer. Same pattern as user layout.
#### 1. Cross-Browser Form Consistency (SC-2)
**Evidence:**
**Test:** Open ShareModal, CloudCredentialModal, and SettingsAccountTab in Chrome, Firefox, and Safari. Examine form inputs, selects, checkboxes.
**Expected:** Consistent baseline appearance across browsers — no browser-default borders, outlines, or checkbox shapes visible.
**Why human:** Can't verify cross-browser rendering programmatically.
- `frontend/src/layouts/AdminLayout.vue`:
- Line 3: `<!-- Mobile-only top header with hamburger (admin) -->`
- Line 6: `@click="drawerOpen = true"`, `data-test="admin-hamburger-btn"`
- Lines 2226: `<Teleport to="body">` backdrop.
- Lines 2933: Sidebar wrapper with `transition-transform lg:static lg:translate-x-0`; `:class="drawerOpen ? 'translate-x-0' : '-translate-x-full'"`.
- Line 52: `const drawerOpen = ref(false)` — state owned by AdminLayout (per D-04).
- Line 57: `watch(() => route.fullPath, () => { ... })` — closes on navigation.
#### 2. Focus Ring Visibility at 375px Viewport
**Status: SATISFIED**
**Test:** Set browser DevTools to iPhone SE (375x667). Tab through the hamburger, sidebar links, StorageBrowser action buttons, and folder tree items (including the expand/collapse button in the sidebar tree, which was fixed in this gap-closure pass).
**Expected:** Focus rings visible on keyboard-navigated elements; hamburger and drawer interactions work smoothly.
**Why human:** Visual rendering of focus rings cannot be asserted by Vitest DOM tests alone.
#### 3. Touch Target Usability at 375px
**Test:** On a real or simulated mobile device at 375px width, attempt to tap the Rename, Delete, Share, and Move icon buttons in the document list.
**Expected:** All taps register on first attempt without requiring precision — 36x36px minimum is sufficient.
**Why human:** Requires physical or emulated touch interaction.
---
## CODE-07 — Dead code deleted
### Gaps Summary
**Requirement:** No unreferenced components, stores, helpers, or unused imports remain in the frontend.
No gaps remain. Both blockers from the initial verification pass are closed.
**Evidence:**
All 12 requirements (VISUAL-01 through VISUAL-04, RESP-01 through RESP-05, CODE-07, PERF-02, PERF-03) are satisfied by codebase evidence. The test suite passes at 268/268 with no regressions.
Plan 11-06 dead-code audit (2026-06-17):
| File | Decision | Evidence |
|------|----------|---------|
| `AccountView.vue` | **DELETED** (commit a8e0a19) | Router only has `{ path: '/account', redirect: '/settings' }` — no component imported or rendered. No reference anywhere in live code. |
| `FolderRow.vue` | **DELETED** (commit a928b54) | No import in any live component. StorageBrowser renders folder rows inline. No active route. Only test references — stale tests removed. |
| `HomeView.vue` | **Confirmed absent** | Per CLAUDE.md rule; does not exist in repo |
| `FolderView.vue` | **Confirmed absent** | Per CLAUDE.md rule; does not exist in repo |
| `AdminView.vue` | **Confirmed absent** | Replaced by AdminLayout + child views in Phase 9 |
| `AdminAiConfigTab.test.js` | **RETAINED** | Imports and tests `AdminAiView.vue` — a live component |
| `AdminQuotasTab.test.js` | **RETAINED** | Imports and tests `AdminQuotasView.vue` — a live component |
| `AdminUsersTab.test.js` | **RETAINED** | Imports and tests `AdminUsersView.vue` — a live component |
Unused imports scan: no unused named imports found across live components. The dual `import * as api` + named imports in `AdminAiView.vue` are both in use (namespace pattern for admin calls, named imports for AI config functions).
**Status: SATISFIED**
Phase 11 goal is achieved. Status is `human_needed` only because three visual/interaction checks require a browser and cannot be asserted programmatically — the automated gate is fully green.
---
## PERF-02 — Bundle baseline + final reports
**Requirement:** Two bundle analysis reports (baseline before Phase 11 and final after all changes) are committed to `.planning/perf/`.
**Evidence:**
| Report | Path | Committed |
|--------|------|-----------|
| Baseline HTML | `.planning/perf/phase11-baseline.html` | commit 6d56d25 (Plan 11-01) |
| Baseline summary | `.planning/perf/phase11-baseline-summary.md` | commit 6d56d25 (Plan 11-01) |
| Final HTML | `.planning/perf/phase11-final.html` | commit 888d376 (Plan 11-06) |
| Final summary | `.planning/perf/phase11-final-summary.md` | commit df981fb (Plan 11-06) |
Key metrics:
- Main bundle: 264.63 kB → 183.62 kB raw (30.6%)
- Gzip: 89.34 kB → 64.83 kB (27.4%)
- JS chunks: 15 → 21 (6 new lazy route chunks)
**Status: SATISFIED**
---
## PERF-03 — Lazy route loading
**Requirement:** All non-initial-render routes are lazy-loaded via `() => import(...)`.
**Evidence:**
`frontend/src/router/index.js`:
```js
// Intentionally synchronous (critical first authenticated surface — D-10):
import FileManagerView from '../views/FileManagerView.vue'
// All other routes lazy-loaded:
{ path: '/topics', component: () => import('../views/TopicsView.vue') }
{ path: '/document/:id', component: () => import('../views/DocumentView.vue') }
{ path: '/settings', component: () => import('../views/SettingsView.vue') }
{ path: '/login', component: () => import('../views/auth/LoginView.vue') }
{ path: '/register', component: () => import('../views/auth/RegisterView.vue') }
{ path: '/password-reset', component: () => import('../views/auth/PasswordResetView.vue') }
{ path: '/password-reset/confirm', component: () => import('../views/auth/NewPasswordView.vue') }
{ path: '/admin', component: () => import('../layouts/AdminLayout.vue'), children: [...all lazy...] }
{ path: '/cloud', component: () => import('../views/CloudStorageView.vue') }
{ path: '/cloud/:provider/:folderId(.*)', component: () => import('../views/CloudFolderView.vue') }
{ path: '/shared', component: () => import('../views/SharedView.vue') }
```
**Rationale for synchronous `FileManagerView`:** Documented in router file. This is the critical first authenticated surface at `/`. Lazy-loading it would delay the initial paint for logged-in users arriving via refresh-token cookie — the most common app entry point.
Build output confirms 21 distinct JS chunks vs. 15 at baseline — 6 new lazy chunks for routes that were previously synchronous (TopicsView, DocumentView, SettingsView, CloudStorageView, CloudFolderView, plus AppSpinner as a sub-chunk).
**Status: SATISFIED**
---
## Summary
| Requirement | Status |
|-------------|--------|
| VISUAL-01 | SATISFIED — skeleton class-based widths; test coverage |
| VISUAL-02 | SATISFIED — @tailwindcss/forms active; form focus ring tests |
| VISUAL-03 | SATISFIED — typography normalized; visual test coverage |
| VISUAL-04 | SATISFIED — 62 focus-visible occurrences; sidebar tests |
| RESP-01 | SATISFIED — user hamburger drawer in App.vue; Teleport backdrop |
| RESP-02 | SATISFIED — StorageBrowser hidden md/sm columns; responsive grid |
| RESP-03 | SATISFIED — 36px touch targets on all action buttons; skeleton tests |
| RESP-04 | SATISFIED — max-h-[90vh] overflow-y-auto on all 4 modals; mobile tests |
| RESP-05 | SATISFIED — admin hamburger drawer in AdminLayout.vue |
| CODE-07 | SATISFIED — FolderRow.vue + AccountView.vue deleted; 3 test files retained |
| PERF-02 | SATISFIED — 4 artifact files committed to .planning/perf/ |
| PERF-03 | SATISFIED — all non-initial routes lazy-loaded; 21 chunks vs 15 baseline |
All 12 Phase 11 requirements are satisfied.
_Initial verification: 2026-06-17T09:30:00Z_
_Re-verification: 2026-06-17T09:45:00Z_
_Verifier: Claude (gsd-verifier)_